Field demonstration busts electrofishing myths
By Luciana Bucater | South Australian Reasearch and Development Institute (SARDI)
On 1 March, the Lower Murray Flow-MER team held an Electrofishing Field Demonstration in Renmark.
Recreational fishers in the Riverland have expressed strong interest in seeing electrofishing in action, and the demonstration aimed to raise community awareness of this common and important fish sampling method.
Around 70 attendees had a chance to learn from researchers from the South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI), who were conducting electrofishing for the Flow-MER Project in the Lower Murray River. A brief introduction to electrofishing was given by Chris Bice, a freshwater fish ecologist from SARDI. He explained how the method generates a field of electricity in the water which temporarily stuns fish in the immediate vicinity (about five metres). The stunned fish are scooped up with a dip net, measured, tagged, and returned to the water safely.
Mr Bice detailed the many advantages of using electrofishing, including capturing fish of varying sizes and allowing for rapid surveys. Most importantly, stunning is only temporary, and fish can be returned to the water unharmed. When performed correctly, electrofishing is safe for fish, and for humans operating the electrofishing unit.
During the day, attendees were able to get a close look at the electrofishing unit on Henri, one of SARDI’s electrofishing boats, while it was anchored on the riverbank of the Jane Eliza Reserve.
They then split into smaller groups, boarded pontoon boats and headed to the sampling sites to watch the demonstration.
Researchers onboard Henri fished at a safe distance from the pontoon boats. Mr Bice and SARDI Inland Waters and Catchment Ecology Program Leader, Associate Professor Qifeng Ye, explained the details of electrofishing as it was happening, and answered the many questions asked by the public.
After five to 10 minutes of electrofishing and scooping fish out of the water, Henri and his crew joined the pontoon boats, where researchers demonstrated how they identify, measure and tag fish.
Participants clearly enjoyed watching the sampling method in action. Some were surprised by the targeted nature of the technique, with fewer fish caught than expected.
They were also impressed by the number of species caught. This included small-bodied native species (including unspecked hardyhead and Murray rainbowfish) and introduced species (such as eastern gambusia) they had never seen before, as well as a healthy, large golden perch and introduced species like redfin, goldfish and common carp.
After the demonstration was completed, many people stayed for a barbecue and mingled with researchers and other members of the public.
We were grateful to receive a lot of positive feedback, both on the day and on social media following the event.
Running an engagement initiative where participants joined scientists in the field helped us bridge knowledge gaps and bust myths about electrofishing.
Such a successful initiative is a team effort, and our thanks go to all involved, namely:
We hope to hold similar events in the future, as they are a great way to engage with the public, including recreational fishers and First Nations groups. They also provide a valuable opportunity to promote the CEWH’s Flow-MER Program as well as research work conducted by SARDI and the broader Lower Murray team.
In a further effort to improve the community’s understanding of electrofishing, we have added a dedicated electrofishing page to the Lower Murray section of the Flow-MER website, explaining how it works, the types of electrofishing, and why the method is safe.
The Lower Murray River is at the end of the Murray Darling Basin (MDB) system and includes the only estuary of the MDB, which connects to the Southern Ocean. Annual flow is variable, being influenced by inputs from the southern and northern basin, and rainfall and water extraction experienced in these regions. The Lower Murray River is complex, and includes the main river channel, anabranches, floodplain / wetlands, billabongs and stream tributaries. Being towards the end of the system, the Lower Murray River is wide and deep relative to upstream reaches, and significant flow is required for floodplain inundation. Our study area covers four different zones: floodplain, gorge, swamplands and the Lower Lakes and Coorong.
The information on this website is presented by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (the Department) for the purposes of disseminating information to the public. It does not constitute legal or other professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed on this website are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Portfolio Ministers for the Department or indicate a commitment to a particular course of action.
While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this website are factually correct, the Commonwealth of Australia does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of its contents. The Department disclaims liability, to the extent permitted by law, for any liabilities, losses, damages and costs arising from any reliance on the contents of this website. You should seek legal or other professional advice in relation to your specific circumstances.
Use of this website is at a user’s own risk and the Department accepts no responsibility for any interference, loss, damage or disruption to your computer system which arises in connection with your use of this website or any linked website.